Barrister

BarristerBarristerBarrister

Barrister

BarristerBarristerBarrister
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • More
    • Home
    • About
    • Blog
    • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

About William Chipperfield

Picture of William Chipperfield - barrister

Interests

William enjoyed playing Polo during his time at Oxford University and hold’s a half blue, he continues to play regularly in his spare time. In addition, he enjoys country walks, target shooting and sailing.


He is a proficient speaker of German, Spanish and French

Career

William Chipperfield is a highly-regarded barrister, due to his dedication to professional integrity, approachability and commitment to maintaining high standards.


Through his practice he advises both corporate and individual clients and accepts direct access work. He can advise on Proceeds of Crim Act, including confiscation, asset forfeiture and restraint. 


His work with private clients has included some of the leading names in the entertainment history, his work with them mostly includes pre-charge advice for a range of criminal charges.

Education and Memberships

Education

Memberships

Memberships

  • Education University of Oxford, Master of Science in Criminology & Criminal Justice  
  • Qualified for the Bar at College of Law, London 
  • University of Staffordshire, BA(Hons) 
  • Aylesbury Grammar School Lord Williams’ Comprehensive School, Thame

Memberships

Memberships

Memberships

Professional Memberships


  • Criminal Bar Association 
  • Amicus (Assisting Lawyers for Justice)
  • Director & Trustee 2006-2016 British Film Institute 
  • Dogs Trust 
  • Oxford University Polo Cub (Alum.)

Areas of Expertise

  • Firearms
  • Violence
  • Sex
  • Drugs
  • Theft
  • Harassment
  • Domestic Violence
  • Road Traffic Incidents (Criminal and Civil Liability)
  • Personal Injury (Vehicle Related)

Notable Cases

R v MF (Winchester Crown Court) - Rape

GK v GK (Cambridge Crown Court) - Driving Offence

R v MF (Winchester Crown Court) - Rape

Serving NCO charged with 9 counts of historic domestic violence ranging from actual bodily harm, controlling and coercive behaviour, cruelty to child under 16, and harassment.  The prosecution case was supported by the evidence of 3 complainants and were largely corroborative.  The defence case rested almost entirely on the evidence of th

Serving NCO charged with 9 counts of historic domestic violence ranging from actual bodily harm, controlling and coercive behaviour, cruelty to child under 16, and harassment.  The prosecution case was supported by the evidence of 3 complainants and were largely corroborative.  The defence case rested almost entirely on the evidence of the defendant and therefore credibility was the key issue at trial.  The jury acquitted the defendant on all counts.  He was further awarded his costs.

R v DB (Luton Crown Court) – Assault

GK v GK (Cambridge Crown Court) - Driving Offence

R v MF (Winchester Crown Court) - Rape

Ex-RAF officer accused of assaulting his wife’s lover, possession of 4 knives and criminal damage (slashing of tyres) to the vehicle used to visit her lover.  The jury acquitted the defendant on all counts.  He was further awarded his costs.

GK v GK (Cambridge Crown Court) - Driving Offence

GK v GK (Cambridge Crown Court) - Driving Offence

GK v GK (Cambridge Crown Court) - Driving Offence

Sales Engineer charged with driving with excess alcohol.  The defendant purchased a bottle of wine on his way to work and purposely consumed half the bottle in the supermarket car park before completing his two-minute journey to work.  Another shopper reported this to the police who attended his place of work and breathalysed him upon his

Sales Engineer charged with driving with excess alcohol.  The defendant purchased a bottle of wine on his way to work and purposely consumed half the bottle in the supermarket car park before completing his two-minute journey to work.  Another shopper reported this to the police who attended his place of work and breathalysed him upon his arrival.  Expert evidence concluded the defendant could not have been drunk at the time of driving due to the absorption rate of alcohol.  The defendant’s conviction and disqualification from driving was subsequently quashed on appeal.  He was further awarded his costs.

Regulated by the Bar Standards Board

Get in Touch

Copyright © 2025 Barrister - All Rights Reserved.

Regulated by the Bar Standards Board

  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Powered by

Cookie Policy

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.

Accept & Close